MSNBC has spent years masquerading as a serious news network. However, the latest ratings reveal the ugly truth: the channel is hemorrhaging viewers, and no amount of smug monologues or White House propaganda can save it.
The return of Rachel Maddow to her cushy Monday-night-only gig—because, let’s face it, even she can’t stand her own show five nights a week—has exposed just how brittle MSNBC’s audience really is. And Jen Psaki’s disastrous debut? Well, let’s just say the network might as well have replaced Maddow with a PowerPoint presentation of Biden’s gaffe reel. The numbers don’t lie, and they paint a picture of a network in freefall.
For years, Rachel Maddow was MSNBC’s golden goose, the queen of conspiratorial eyebrow raises and meandering 20-minute monologues that somehow always circled back to Russia. But her triumphant return to a regular schedule? More like a whimper.
During her final week hosting a nightly show, she pulled in 2.1 million viewers—a respectable number, if you ignore the fact that most of them were probably asleep with the TV on. But once she retreated back to her once-a-week safe space, her numbers cratered. Her first Monday-only show dropped dramatically to 1.7 million viewers, with a pathetic 155,000 in the key 25-54 demo.
What does this tell us? Simple: Maddow’s act is stale. Even her most devoted fans can only take so much of her breathless doom-mongering before they start flipping over to Wheel of Fortune. MSNBC leaned on her like a crutch, and now that she’s back to phoning it in one night a week, the network is realizing it has nothing else to offer.
If MSNBC thought replacing Maddow with Jen Psaki would save them, they were in for a rude awakening. Psaki, the former White House press secretary whose greatest talent was spinning Biden’s incoherent mumbles into something resembling English, was supposed to be the network’s next big star. Instead, The Briefing debuted to a spectacular faceplant.
In its first week, Psaki’s show averaged a measly 1.1 million viewers—a 47% drop from Maddow’s final week in the same slot. Even worse? The key demo numbers were a bloodbath: just 92,000 viewers in the 25-54 range. That’s not just bad—that’s ”why is this show still on the air?” bad. Psaki’s performance is so dismal that it makes CNN’s endless panels of Trump-deranged pundits look like must-see TV.
The problem isn’t just that Psaki is boring (though she is). It’s that MSNBC’s entire lineup is built for an audience that doesn’t exist anymore. The network is still operating under the delusion that America is dying for more smug lectures from ex-Obama staffers and failed Democratic operatives. But here’s the reality: people are tuning out.
Maddow’s absence didn’t just hurt her own timeslot—it tanked MSNBC’s entire primetime lineup. During her 100-day nightly run, the network averaged 1.149 million viewers. Once she went back to her Monday-only cameo, that number plummeted 22% to 892,000. That puts MSNBC right back where it was before the 2020 election—a network nobody watches unless there’s a Trump tweet to hyperventilate over.
The lesson here is obvious: MSNBC has no depth. Its entire primetime strategy revolves around Maddow, and when she’s not there, the whole operation collapses like a Jenga tower built on Morning Joe’s dynamic duo fo dumbsh*ts ramblings. The network’s other “stars”—Chri Hayes, Lawrence O’Donnell, and remind me who else—are glorified filler content; the kind of people you may tolerate while waiting for something better to come on.
MSNBC’s ratings disaster isn’t just about bad programming—it’s about a fundamental miscalculation. The network bet everything on the idea that America would remain perpetually outraged at Trump and obsessed with every Democratic talking point. But here’s the thing: Biden is gone and the Trump presidency has been a rousing success.
When your entire business model depends on people being angry at Republicans, what happens when the Democrats are the ones setting the country on fire? MSNBC is finding out the hard way. The network’s viewers are aging out, Further, its messaging is repetitive, and its talent pool is a revolving door of ex-White House flacks who think “good ratings” means lecturing the audience for an hour.
If these trends continue—and there’s no reason to think they won’t—MSNBC is headed for a reckoning. By the end of Trump’s second term, at least half of its current lineup will be gone, either by cancellation or sheer irrelevance. The network’s only hope is a complete reinvention. Not likely to happen, given that would require self-awareness.
In the end, MSNBC’s collapse will be poetic justice. A network that spent years peddling hysteria, smearing conservatives, and pretending to be journalism is now watching its audience evaporate. The only question left is: How low do the ratings have to go before they finally admit they were wrong?
DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS WEBSITE!
The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for a one man team to manually review each and every one of the posts atomicbobs.com gets on a daily basis.
The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of Atomicbobs. This site may contain adult language, if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to
USE DISCERNMENT
and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Atomicbobs.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Atomicbobs.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This website implements certain security features in order to prevent spam and posting abuse. By making a post on this website you consent to any automated security checks required by our system to authenticate your IP address as belonging to an actual human. It is forbidden to make posts on this website from open proxy servers. By making a post on this website you consent to an automated one time limited port scan of your IP address which is required by our security system to validate the authenticity of your internet connection.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Atomicbobs.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
At some point freedom of speech and copyright law merge. The following interpretation of "Fair Use" and subsequent posting policy were developed with the assistance of qualified legal council however, we are not lawyers and cannot offer you legal advise as to the limits of "Fair Use"
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Though legally each situation is evaluated independently according to guidelines that were intentionally left open to interpretation, we believe generally this policy represents "Fair Use" of any such copyrighted material for the purposes of education and discussion.
You are responsible for what you "publish" on the internet. You must be sure any copyrighted material you choose to post for discussion on this forum falls within the limits of "Fair Use" as defined by the law.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of "Fair Use" and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright
we may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
If you require a courier address please send a fax or email and we will provide you with the required information.
For expedited human review & removal of potential copyright violations we encourage users & copyright holders to utilize the "Report Copyright Violation" button that accompanies each post published on this website.
In accordance with section 512 of the U.S. Copyright Act our contact information has been registered with the United States Copyright Office. "Safe Harbor" noticing procedures as outlined in the DMCA apply to this website concerning all 3rd party posts published herein.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question. It is our strict policy to disable access to accounts of repeat copyright violators. We will also ban the IP address of repeat offenders from future posting on this website with or without a registered account.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Atomicbobs.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
---
DON'T BREAK THE LAW!
---
Other than that you can do / say whatever you want on this forum.
We reserve the right to block access to this website by any individual or organization at any time for any reason whatsoever or no reason at all.
| 