De: "I get the feeling that you wanted to have a high score... and that's weird. Why? Are you trying to impress someone?"
Ah...no! I'm trying to keep an open mind to things I am quite sure our government WOULD do, and COULD do, which I haven't ruled out as, basically, impossible.
Remember the rule of "MMO": means, MOTIVE, and opportunity. I have no doubt at all, for example, that parties within our government WOULD and COULD have, at least, enabled 911 in order to get that VERY profitable Iraq war going. 3,000 civilians dead and recycle the real estate with some newer buildings? Cheap at 10x the price!! If you can't look at Cheney and figure out, right away, he would have NO problem murdering millions for sufficient profit (as long as there was no real risk to him) you are not a very good judge of character. 3,000 would have come easy. (And wasn't it odd that Al Queda chose such an unlikely time to take out the building? A few hours later and they could have killed ten times as many Americans)
So, in some of these cases I don't feel I sufficiently grok the MOTIVE. Or I feel the motive is there, but I haven't got enough facts to PIN the commission "beyond a reasonable doubt". But, it isn't an issue of means, motive, and opportunity. In the case of 911, means, motive, and opportunity were all there in spades. And there are way, way, way too many factual oddities for me not to be 99%+ convinced we don't have anywhere near the correct story.
Extraordinarily implausible that that plane brought down any of those buildings, and certainly not building 7.
Or let's take the Epstein "suicide" story -- and the UNDENIABLE COVERUP BY THE US GOVERNMENT OF WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED. And WHEN, exactly, are we going to see the full list of Jeffry's Clients? Don't hold your breath.
| 
