« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Should we take out violent EU Leninists before, or after, they form their army and take over Canada? 

By: Zimbler0 in GRITZ | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 08 May 25 1:12 AM | 10 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 08020 of 08084
(This msg. is a reply to 07988 by Fiz)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Fiz > And Leninism is, by founding principles, dedicated to use ALL means necessary to overthow our form of government. E.g., they don't play by 'rules'.


So, are you telling me Leninism is imperialistic?
And here I thought it was just their leaders.

Islam does have its rules - which say it is OK to lie, cheat, and steal - - from infidels.

I'm sure 'Leninism' has its 'rules' as well.

Putin has a long history of violating 'cease fires'. It's almost as if he (and islamics) think a 'cease fire' means 'they' can't shoot at 'them' but 'them' can shoot (with impunity) at they.

And so Trump thinks he has a 'cease fire' so 'lets make a deal' can happen and peace comes. But before the ink has had time to dry both sides are in violation . . . Putin because he has no intention of actually adhering to a cease fire . . and Ukraine because they know from bitter experience that Putin is NOT going to go along with the cease fire terms.

So lets give Ukraine some more ammunition, some long range munitions, and the stuff they need to make drones that can cripple Russia's economy.
Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Should we take out violent EU Leninists before, or after, they form their army and take over Canada?
By: Fiz
in GRITZ
Wed, 07 May 25 4:43 PM
Msg. 07988 of 08084

So, you mean just stand back, and allow their economy to naturally collapse?

There are obvious, problems I see with that is:

(1) The OBVIOUSLY want to use WAR as a means to artificially prop up their economy, delaying the collapse. Do you favor getting out of NATO -- why or why not since WE (the US) obviously gets little to no protection value from NATO?

(2) They are obviously, actively attacking the US thorugh subrosa means, and have been for years. E.G., (a) interfere in US politics and policy (b) economic and legal challenges (c) Planting 'agents' in other countries (e.g., Carney in Canada).

(3) Their form of government is antithetical to actual Democracy. I understand, and agree with you, that governments around the world interfere with elections to get the final 'victor' who will reinforce the system. But, in the case of EU, this is both unusually heavy-handed AND

(4) The EU system is Fabin Socialist by DESIGN -- that really isn't open to debate (I don't think?). So it is, supposedly, 'Marxism Lite'. Why are we *defending* Marxist governements AT ALL -- given their avowed goal is to eliminate capitalism...in the long run.

(5) But, actually, EU is, as China's CCP and the US's "Democratic Party", ACTUALLY Leninist. I've been documenting this for some time. LENINISM is an AVOWED Radical/Violent *RELIGION* compoletely antithetical to actual Freedom on any level.

Anyway, those are some of my questions.

The core problem with your approach is (A) we are NOT ostracizing them, in any regard, but basically swimming naked in their pool and sleeping in their bed (B) The have vowed, and attempted, in many way for hundreds of years, to interfere withour system of individual sovereignty via minmial government under a Constitution. And Leninism is, by founding principles, dedicated to use ALL means necessary to overthow our form of government. E.g., they don't play by 'rules'.


« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next