If the Supreme Court doesn't show up AGAINST WEAPONIZATION of the courts, and soon, it is going to to be the death of Rule of Law. We don't HAVE "rule of law" we have rule by enemies of equal justice under the law. There should be SEVERE consequences for lower court judges having their decisions over-ruled at the Supreme Court level. And, yes, there should be some sort of "three strikes" law for judges in all court cases -- like three strikes and you are out of the profession FOR LIFE...*never* to be appointed again for anything.
There are so many challenges for the Republic right now. 99% of the enemies of America *live* in America...and 90% of those enemies claim to "work" in government.
---
http://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-just-got-game-changing-legal-victory
"This is a huge victory for President Trump and his Article II powers granted in the United States Constitution. It's also a victory for US Agency for Global Media (USAGM) and VOA," Kari Lake told Fox News Digital. Lake now serves as a USAGM senior advisor to the Trump administration. "We are eager to accomplish President Trump's America First agenda which has always been to modernize and make our government efficient while cutting waste, fraud, and abuse.”
The appeals court's 2-1 ruling Saturday emphasized the judiciary's deference to executive authority in matters concerning federal employment and contractual decisions.
The court noted that the district court likely lacked jurisdiction to interfere with the administration's personnel actions and funding decisions, particularly regarding grant agreements with non-federal entities like Radio Free Asia and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks.
This ruling Trump's March 14 executive order (EO), which aimed to dismantle USAGM operations.
This ruling effectively reins in district courts that have been sidestepping proper jurisdictional channels in cases challenging Trump administration actions. The decision serves as a clear reminder that courts themselves must operate within their prescribed legal boundaries.
According to Margot Cleveland, senior legal correspondent for The Federalist, the D.C. Circuit’s ruling hinges on a critical point: jurisdiction, which has sweeping implications. As Cleveland explains, many of the legal challenges being hurled at the Trump administration involve employment decisions—precisely the kind of disputes Congress has explicitly said federal district courts have no authority to adjudicate.
| 
