Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Hockey Stick - nonupdate

By: monkeytrots in GRITZ | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 05 May 25 5:37 AM | 8 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens! 		Msg. 07838 of 07841
(This msg. is a reply to 07825 by Zimbler0)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>>> I don't know if this will help Steyn's case or not . . . But I like it.

Yes. Sure hope it helps his appeal. Like Steyn - especially when he would fill in for Rush Limbaugh.
Cannuck judiciary showing better sense than "Merican - whooda thunk it.

Man has also refused to this day to submit his 'programs' (not just data) to peer review. He HAS been shown to have omitted a particular set of data from 'his proprietary dataset'.

Another travesty, along same lines of fraud, was the NASA deletion of a tremendous amount of RAW(climate) satellite data - should have been criminally prosecuted.
Satellite data for climate use is always heavily massaged with 'data corrections/adjustments/etc' and ONLY the RAW data can be used for getting to the truth of matters.

Ya might get a kick out of THIS 'grok' reply to a fraud question. It is one of those GIGO results, imo.

I hold 'government and university ethics investigation in deep disrespect - trust is non-existent, for me, for those two; CYA rules both those orgs. So, take the Grok answer with a salt-mine sized grain of salt. My brief review at the time came to far different conclusions. I did see real fraud and deliberate misinformation and suppression of results. Grok asserts udder-wise.

What are the particulars about the university in UK fraud in climate change emails several years ago

Shortcut to answer: http://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1919229419584987628

lengthy, but interesting.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Hockey Stick - nonupdate
By: Zimbler0 in GRITZ
Mon, 05 May 25 3:59 AM 		Msg. 07825 of 07841

MT > What is the current status of the 'hockey stick' lawsuit against Mark Stein ? ... err Steyn)

Well Professor,
I don't know if this will help Steyn's case or not . . . But I like it.

>>>
Climate change hoax collapses as Michael Mann’s bogus “hockey stick” graph defamation lawsuit dismissed by the Supreme Court of British Columbia

http://www.climatesciencenews.com/2019-08-26-climate-change-hoax-collapses-as-michael-mann-bogus-hockey-stick-graph.html

08/26/2019
For the past two decades, much of the hysteria about global warming — later re-labeled “climate change” — has been based on the so-called “hockey stick” graph produced by Michael Mann. The graph, shown below, has been used by the IPCC, the media and governments to push global warming hysteria to the point of mass mental illness, where Democrat presidential candidates claim humanity only has 12 years remaining before a climate apocalypse will somehow destroy the planet.

But the hockey stick graph is a fraud. A man-made computer software algorithm generated it, and the algorithm is rigged to produce a hockey stick shape no matter what data were entered. Like everything else found in the rigged world of “climate science,” the hockey stick graph was a fraud the day it was generated.

Michael Mann didn’t like being called a fraud by his critics, so he sued them for defamation. And late last week, one of those lawsuits was concluded by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada, which threw out Mann’s lawsuit against Dr. Tim Ball. But there’s more. According to Principia-Scientific:

Not only did the court grant Ball’s application for dismissal of the nine-year, multi-million dollar lawsuit, it also took the additional step of awarding full legal costs to Ball. A detailed public statement from the world-renowned skeptical climatologist is expected in due course.

This extraordinary outcome is expected to trigger severe legal repercussions for Dr Mann in the U.S. and may prove fatal to climate science claims that modern temperatures are “unprecedented.”
Michael Mann refuses to turn over the data behind the graph, insisting on secrecy instead of transparency
>>>

(Article does continue. Zim.)

« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next