« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: In rebuttal to libelous posts here about Mike Waltz

By: monkeytrots in GRITZ | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 03 May 25 2:42 AM | 15 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 07693 of 07724
(This msg. is a reply to 07692 by De_Composed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

LMAO - Hyup - dat's wuts I be der - a dumb, lucky, unedumicated hick.

Rest of post deleted - not worth the effort. The blind will be blind.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: In rebuttal to libelous posts here about Mike Waltz
By: De_Composed
in GRITZ
Sat, 03 May 25 2:29 AM
Msg. 07692 of 07724

mt:

Re: “Think that trumps your hour or so of 'business law' class - in spades.”
It doesn't. Sounds like you got lucky with your case. ("Stopped clock" syndrome.) To qualify as libel, a statement must be false (fizzy's isn't), cause harm to Waltz's reputation (fizzy's didn't), and be performed with actual malice (fizzy's wasn't). Before you knock someone else's legal understanding, you might want to take an hour or so (two quarters, actually) of "business law" yourself.






« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next