Fiz - good article. Thank you for posting that.
>>> This war has a long way to go.
Agreed, 100% - a long, long, long ways to go.
Not just information and research paid for by NIH - but by many, many other areas that U.S. are paying for with public money.
Many moons ago - did a deep dive into the 'Ozone Hole' hysteria. Attacked it in search from many angles, measurements of actual ozone levels (instrumentation, methodology, sampling density, measurement reliability, etc); from relationship to solar activity (seasonal earth orbit effects, sunspot activity, cosmic ray effects); repeatability or other evidence of 'holes' that may exist elsewhere (found a profound non-seasonal effect of ozone 'thinning' actually exists at the equatorial high altitudes, but not over the rest of 'earth') and other avenues of attack/investigstion - such as 'relationships/interactions with earth's magnetosphere' (hint - profound).
The one area where I got completely stymied was at 'paywalls - don't use 'em cuz me a tightwad - from PUBLICLY FUNDED university research into the 'much claimed catalytic effect of fluorocarbons' - how does this catalytic effect actually function. BLOCKED. I profoundly doubt this effect - due to my own personal experience with 'fluorocarbons'. High energy quickly DESTROYS fluorocarbons aka. 'freons'. A very 'easy' test for freon leaks is an open flame (eg a match) at suspected sites. Freon reacts violently, changes colour of flame as it oxidizes, and decomposes completely with a strong acidic odour - like vinegar. OZONE is an EXTREMELY HIGH OXIDIZER, and cosmic radiation is an EXTREMELY HIGH ENERGY SOURCE - ie. the match, the ignitor. So the hypothesis of a self-regenerating 'catalyst' with such profound 'ozone destroying' properties was (and remains) a point of contention for me. Research into this 'phenomena' was ALL paywalled - and thus a dead end for me.The 'majic box' of freon-as-catalyst remains in the literature with nothing more than a 'majic wand' presentation in any of the published chemical reaction formulae.
Other areas that are shut down - ANY real information about the design, operation, corrosion problems, etc. of NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS - research that USED to be published (paid for by US) and was readily available, was pretty much completely removed from the internet in the early 2000's. Even doing searches for that type of info gets one flagged as a potential terrorist and put on some pretty nasty watch lists. PERRHAPS excusable from a 'national security' standpoint - but also very limiting in public understanding, knowledge, implementation, and trust of GOOD 'nuclear'.
The government HIDES a lot of useful information - paywalls are just ONE of many techniques they employ.
NOT just the NIH hear. A whole slew of the deep state entities are involved.
Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...
| 