Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: US Democratic Party, as the CCP, is LENINIST and not Marxist, nor Communist. What is the difference?

By: monkeytrots in GRITZ | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 13 Apr 25 9:56 PM | 21 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens! 		Msg. 06704 of 07371
(This msg. is a reply to 06702 by Fiz)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Is it real, or is it Memorex ?

The easiest way to distract attention and divert attention away from the central command headquarters, is to attack from ALL FRONTS - and prevent the Central Command from being identified.

Remember HWB and his 'new world order' ?

Or remember the Washington Post's 'religious editor' - for decades, who, turned out was an occultist often supporting obvious satanism ?

There are only two religions in the World.

Religion of the Law: Here is a set of rules on how you can be 'saved' - follow these rules and you will 'become a better person', achieve Nirvana, be reincarnated to higher plane, be rewarded with 72 virgins, become a god, improve the world, understand the universe, blah, blah, blah.

and then there is the other 'religion':
Religion of the Gospel - GOD has done it ALL - you can do nothing. IT IS FINISHED.

Rejoice and be glad in it.

That sirs, is your TWO COMMAND CENTERS.

Good and evil.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


 - - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: US Democratic Party, as the CCP, is LENINIST and not Marxist, nor Communist. What is the difference?
By: Fiz in GRITZ
Sun, 13 Apr 25 9:33 PM 		Msg. 06702 of 07371

De, See the extra quote from Lenin I just included. Lenin recognized that de-centralized "Communism" wasn't very effective; his contribution was to organize/centralize it.

Also, getting around the "evidence" of silence has been one of the most troublesome aspects of explaining something like this: "But surely someone would have said something!"

I think we now have overwhelming evidence that "whistle-blowers" can be silenced very effectively; to a degree I would have thought impossible, if you had asked me 10-20 years ago. Viz: "conspiracy theorist!"; "racist! Blackmail. Murder. Threat of firing or lawsuit. Censorship (easy as pie, once you control effectively ALL mainstream media). Propaganda (probably 10-100X more effective than we would have thought before the internet and recent evidence of ow easy it is to control shunning and 'free speech'.) And general fatigue/ learned-helplessness of the plugged-in.

And that is all pretty much on top of the PROVEN effectiveness of Lenin's own strategy as well described in his quote ... and demonstrated in color-revolutions all over the world in the last 125+ years.

The naive person, at this point, is... unbelievably... the person who does NOT think something monstrous and organized can be silenced! The evidence of our lifetimes all says it is actually quite easy to silence almost anything. Indeed, arguably, the larger scale cover-ups may be actually easier to cover up, and the feedback and general frenzy quickly overwhelms the signal.

If you need one clear-cut piece of evidence of this: I'm sure you noticed that in the last few years the Democrats began SYSTEMATICALLY, pre-emptively accusing their opposition of all the things they, themselves, were doing or planning on doing.

« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next