« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: SCOTUS - Bring Garcia back

By: Zimbler0 in GRITZ | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 12 Apr 25 2:22 AM | 13 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 06625 of 07425
(This msg. is a reply to 06604 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

MonkeyTrots > Not even 'shared intelligence' from El Salvador.


Out of curiosity . . .
Do you have access to 'shared intelligence from El Salvador'? All of it?

I don't think any of the 'leakers' or 'moles' or other treasonous turds still in the Trump administration are going to 'leak' anything detrimental to Garcia's case. And I think it probable that Trump's people also do not want to leak anything sensitive - so as not to reveal any 'intelligence sources'.

I do not know if Garcia is innocent or not.

I do know that he illegally entered this country. And that a (possibly) douche bag judge decided his 'sob story' entitled him to not be sent back to El Salvador.

But anytime the so-called 'mainstream media' appears to be working overtime to convince me that something is true . . . My spidey senses set off a Red Alert.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: SCOTUS - Bring Garcia back
By: monkeytrots
in GRITZ
Fri, 11 Apr 25 9:59 PM
Msg. 06604 of 07425

>>> http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a949_lkhn.pdf

Thank you for that link, CTJ.

Recommend everyone read it, it is an easy read - and summarizes the facts of the case very clearly, without prejudice to either side (DOJ or District Court).

The WARNING about 'possibly exceeding authority' to the District Court is the most important part of the ruling, and definitely a good sign that our SCOTUS will not allow a 'judicial coup d'etat' to take place.

Ie. It was a serious warning to ALL Federal District Courts.

Even Sotomayer's included statement is well written and worth reading.

Also note on the 'MS-13' issue, SCOTUS recognizes the government's claim as being an accusation, and also the claims of the defendant that Garcia is not a member. It does not support nor deny either side's claims.

The ONLY evidence I have seen on the issue came from an unidentified informant in the 2019 case, upon which the District Judge ordered that the defendant would have to be detained until the immigration proceedings were concluded. I have seen NO COURT FILINGS, Law Enforcement (such as Maryland police) affidavits or other instruments presenting evidence supporting the government accusations. Not even 'shared intelligence' from El Salvador. NONE.

There is reason for this lack of actual evidence from never have been presented as 'sworn to be true under penalty of perjury.' ... and pardon me if I no longer buy ANY US Government officials 'excuse' for same being that it would 'reveal classified methods or sources.'

Would our government LIE about such a thing ?

Well ask the person who was ACCUSED by 'the government' about being a Russian agent by a FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT presented by a DOJ LAWYER to a FISA COURT, when that person had been exactly the opposite. Remember the failed entrapment attempt by the same cabal to get the guy to carry over 10k on his person during international travel ? Remember they even arrested him upon entry back into the US - and couldn't find the 10k on him ?

No, perish the thought US Law Enforcement would ever lie to the Courts or fabricate evidence that a US Citizen was never allowed to see or challenge. Much less that they would do so to an illegal immigrant.

Ask Carter Paige, and lookup Clinesmith if your memory is a tad fuzzy on these pretty damn scary facts.


« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next