Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: SCOTUS - Bring Garcia back

By: monkeytrots in GRITZ | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 11 Apr 25 9:59 PM | 11 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens! 		Msg. 06604 of 07402
(This msg. is a reply to 06582 by CTJ)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>>> http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a949_lkhn.pdf

Thank you for that link, CTJ.

Recommend everyone read it, it is an easy read - and summarizes the facts of the case very clearly, without prejudice to either side (DOJ or District Court).

The WARNING about 'possibly exceeding authority' to the District Court is the most important part of the ruling, and definitely a good sign that our SCOTUS will not allow a 'judicial coup d'etat' to take place.

Ie. It was a serious warning to ALL Federal District Courts.

Even Sotomayer's included statement is well written and worth reading.

Also note on the 'MS-13' issue, SCOTUS recognizes the government's claim as being an accusation, and also the claims of the defendant that Garcia is not a member. It does not support nor deny either side's claims.

The ONLY evidence I have seen on the issue came from an unidentified informant in the 2019 case, upon which the District Judge ordered that the defendant would have to be detained until the immigration proceedings were concluded. I have seen NO COURT FILINGS, Law Enforcement (such as Maryland police) affidavits or other instruments presenting evidence supporting the government accusations. Not even 'shared intelligence' from El Salvador. NONE.

There is reason for this lack of actual evidence from never have been presented as 'sworn to be true under penalty of perjury.' ... and pardon me if I no longer buy ANY US Government officials 'excuse' for same being that it would 'reveal classified methods or sources.'

Would our government LIE about such a thing ?

Well ask the person who was ACCUSED by 'the government' about being a Russian agent by a FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT presented by a DOJ LAWYER to a FISA COURT, when that person had been exactly the opposite. Remember the failed entrapment attempt by the same cabal to get the guy to carry over 10k on his person during international travel ? Remember they even arrested him upon entry back into the US - and couldn't find the 10k on him ?

No, perish the thought US Law Enforcement would ever lie to the Courts or fabricate evidence that a US Citizen was never allowed to see or challenge. Much less that they would do so to an illegal immigrant.

Ask Carter Paige, and lookup Clinesmith if your memory is a tad fuzzy on these pretty damn scary facts.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: SCOTUS - Bring Garcia back
By: CTJ in GRITZ
Fri, 11 Apr 25 5:17 PM 		Msg. 06582 of 07402

The Supreme Court’s order does not require the government to return Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the United States. But it does uphold a lower court’s directive that the government must “facilitate” his release from custody in El Salvador.


The SCOTUS order also told the government to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly deported.

The improper part of his deportation was him being sent to El Salvador which was a violation of the 2019 deportation/Suspend deportation ruling. He can be deported to other countries.

The 2019 Order to Suspend is only to stop him from being deported to El Salvador.

Things to note:
The SCOTUS has zero jurisdiction over the El Salvador. They cannot tell The President of El Salvador what to do.

In 2019 it was determined by a court that Garcia was an illegal.

The Order to Suspend in 2019 was handed down because Garcia claimed that rival gangs might kill him if sent to El Salvador.

Deporting him To El Salvador was the improper act. Not deporting him.

The SCOTUS said that the lower court might be overstepping their authority. Hinting that the lower court needed to be extremely careful with what they now do.

If Garcia is released from El Salvador, it would be in compliance with the order for the government to deport him to any other country or to ship him to GITMO.i think he’ll end up in GITMO.


Here’s a link to the SCOTUS Order
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a949_lkhn.pdf

« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next