Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: About that SCOTUS decision ... 

By: De_Composed in GRITZ | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 09 Apr 25 5:12 AM | 22 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens! 		Msg. 06504 of 07466
(This msg. is a reply to 06502 by monkeytrots)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

mt:

Re: “And that is ALL that the decision said.”The case wasn't about anything else. The Solicitor General argued that the appeals court had exceeded its power in issuing its restraining order and that the case needed to be conducted in Texas, not the District of Columbia. That's all the court was being asked.

Even the Supreme Court is not free to go off on tangents. It gets asked a question and it provides an answer. If a different question needs answering, that's usually going to be a different case.

While I understand your frustration, the Solicitor General asked the SCOTUS whether the case should be heard in Texas. It said yes. You may have reason to bitch about the Solicitor General, but you shouldn't be angry with the SCOTUS.

I'll add that if the Solicitor General had asked a different question, the SCOTUS may well have declined to hear the argument at all. So I'm pleased with how things turned out even though it doesn't mean that this particular deportation case is finished.

The Left shops for courts that are friendly to its positions, keeps getting them and keeps getting unlawful rulings that a higher court has to shoot down. I'm sick of that. Monday's ruling may mean that THAT strategy is about played out. I sure hope so.






 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
About that SCOTUS decision ...
By: monkeytrots in GRITZ
Wed, 09 Apr 25 2:49 AM 		Msg. 06502 of 07466

The headlines lie, and Bondi exaggerates the so-called 'victory'.

The Supreme Court decision said diddly squat about 'allowing deportations', nor did they uphold the executive right to enforce the 'enemy alien' act.
THEY PUNTED - PURE AND SIMPLE - they took the cowards way out and avoided any REAL consequential action.

Read the frickin decision - and QUIT LYING ABOUT IT, conservative media.

THE QUAGMIRE OF JUDICIAL COUP D'ETAT didn't even get a featherweight body blow.

[b]ALL THE FREAKING DECISION SAID WAS - Boasberg doesn't have jurisdiction, The Texas Federal Judges have jurisdiction.

And that is ALL that the decision said.

SCOTUS squatted and left a smelly one a lyin' in the street.

Yeah, I am pretty damn disgusted with SCOTUS and with the conservative 'yeehaw' media touting lies in their headlines.

« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next