« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Supreme Court rules for GOP in South Carolina redistricting case

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 23 May 24 5:38 PM | 25 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 53122 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 53119 by clo2)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Unfortunately, Alito gets to offer such an opinion because American politics is racially segregated. Being black and being preponderantly Democrat are idenical things. The GOP can define districts knowing racial concentration and Dem concentration are indistinguishable.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Supreme Court rules for GOP in South Carolina redistricting case
By: clo2
in ALEA
Thu, 23 May 24 4:31 PM
Msg. 53119 of 54959

and Alito wrote the opinion!

Supreme Court rules for GOP in South Carolina redistricting case
Civil rights groups argued that Republican Rep. Nancy Mace’s district was redrawn by unlawfully removing thousands of Black voters.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that Republicans in South Carolina did not unlawfully consider race when they drew a congressional district in a way that removed thousands of Black voters.

The court, divided 6-3 on ideological lines with conservatives in the majority, said civil rights group had not done enough to show that legislators were focused on race in drawing the Charleston-area district currently represented by Rep. Nancy Mace, a Republican.

In doing so, the court sided with Republican state officials who said their sole goal was to increase the Republican tilt in the district.

As a result of the ruling, Mace's district will not have to be re-drawn, delivering a blow to Democrats who would have hoped to secure a more favorable map. Litigation on a separate claim brought by plaintiffs against the map could continue.

Writing for the majority, conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote that "no direct evidence" supports the lower court's finding that race was a key consideration when the map was drawn.

"The circumstantial evidence falls far short of showing that race, not partisan preferences, drove the districting process," he added.

While the Supreme Court was considering the case, much more slowly than expected, the lower court that had invalidated the map said it could be used for this year's election.

In dissent, liberal Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the majority had "stacked the deck" against the challengers.

"What a message to send to state legislators and mapmakers about racial gerrymandering," she added.

more:
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-gop-south-carolina-redistricting-case-rcna127946


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next