Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Prince Harry will not receive special security protection, court says

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 28 Feb 24 9:14 PM | 27 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 52377 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 52372 by clo2)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

And given how widely he is loathed here, tax payers don't want to pay for him.

He made a decision not to be an active royal family member. There are costs and benefits to his decision. The benefit is, he has kept his title and has made a lot of money trashing his family. The cost is, security is expensive. But he has the money from trashing his family to pay for his security. So there you go.

Maybe he should put out a line of gold sneakers with union jacks (our British flag) on them.

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Prince Harry will not receive special security protection, court says
By: clo2 in ALEA
Wed, 28 Feb 24 3:50 PM 		Msg. 52372 of 54959

Prince Harry will not receive special security protection, court says

In his 51-page ruling, High Court Judge Peter Lane said that the approach by the executive committee for the protection of royalty and public figures — also known as Ravec — was not irrational nor was it procedurally unfair. The judge said that Harry’s lawyers had “an inappropriate, formalist interpretation of the Ravec process.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/02/28/prince-harry-uk-court-security/

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next