To be fair, they would say the opposite: you want to defend lives outside the womb but don't care about life inside.
It's just a sad debate, when opinion are so hardened. I don't see any new ideas appearing. It's all about which underlying right you hold sacred.
I prefer to think about reponsibilities. How long do parents need to make a decision? How long do doctors need for medical purposes? Outer boundary is sentience, but we don't need to push hard up against it.
I don't care about conflicting ideas about undiluted rights. They will solve nothing. The only useful conversations about rights are the exceptions.
| 