« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Matthew Mcconaughey makes the point

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 08 Jun 22 2:36 PM | 11 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 46044 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 46042 by clo2)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

To be fair, they would say the opposite: you want to defend lives outside the womb but don't care about life inside.

It's just a sad debate, when opinion are so hardened. I don't see any new ideas appearing. It's all about which underlying right you hold sacred.

I prefer to think about reponsibilities. How long do parents need to make a decision? How long do doctors need for medical purposes? Outer boundary is sentience, but we don't need to push hard up against it.

I don't care about conflicting ideas about undiluted rights. They will solve nothing. The only useful conversations about rights are the exceptions.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Matthew Mcconaughey makes the point
By: clo2
in ALEA
Wed, 08 Jun 22 2:26 PM
Msg. 46042 of 54959

He was amazing, I was watching.

He should run for governor of Texas.

Beto doesn't have a chance.

You've got to hear the excuses these republicans are giving for the NEED of those weapons, they NEED them to hunt varmints!!! WTF!!!

They want to ban abortions to save an embryo, but won't ban a weapon of mass destruction!
once you're out of the womb, fend for yourselves...


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next