Replies to Msg. #1205869
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
32129 Re: gwb….Ukraine
   
Saddam Hussein had the money with which to finance 9-11. (Corruption from the 'oil for food' program to the tune of a billion or so dollars a year.)

john kerry was running for President. john kerry accused then President Bush of 'lying'. kerry had absolutely NOTHING even faintly resembling evidence that Bush had lied. (Saddam had no WMD's? A binary nerve gas artillery shell is a pretty gnarly weapon for someone 'with no WMD's' to be in possession of.)

There were numerous linkages between saddams people and osama-bin-ladens people. (For purely political purposes the demo-rats were trying their best to erase or nullify all evidence of such linkages.)

Next. The same people who wanted U.S. to believe 'we should not have invaded Iraq' are of the same stripe as the lying traitorous treasonous turds who claimed Trump 'was conspiring with the Russians' - with NO evidence. And who (twice) deprived Trump of his Constitutional Right to call witnesses at his 'impeachment trials'. And who stole the 2020 election.

It is my opinion that Iraq was the right place to invade at that time.

1.) Iraq was NOT in compliance with the 'no WMD's' mandates of the United Nations.

2.) 'Oil for Food' was corruption gone wild and saddam was in the process of buying U.N. delegates with it.

3.) All the worlds wanna-be terror-mongering despots needed an object lesson that the United States could and would go after them as necessary.

There was plenty of evidence.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.