« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Cactus Flower...

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 31 Mar 22 7:48 PM | 24 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 45183 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 45182 by fizzy)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I have no problem with people having opinions. And it was nice of you to say thanks!

The thing I don't like is when folks come on this board and become belligerent before I know much about them, and then go down the abusive road. Life's too short, and so on. Disagreeing isn't an issue. But leaving folks space to have different opinions is always helpful. No one means badly by you just because they don't adopt the same positions you do. So far, I'm not having a problem although our politics are obviously going to be different.

Back to the jabs...

Have you had a look at the divergence between the mortality rates in the UK and the US once the two covid vaccination programmes were in place? I am assuming both countries have similar (or similar enough) methods of quantifying mortality for a comparison to be valid. But if you say no comparison is possible that way, then surplus deaths yields fairly similar results.

At any rate, the UK, which had persistently higher vaccination rates has had a much lower covid mortality rate and surplus death rate than the US since the two programmes started. Does your way of thinking about things have a different explanation than what seems the obvious one: that higher shot rates produce lower death rates, at least in the short run?


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Cactus Flower...
By: fizzy
in ALEA
Thu, 31 Mar 22 7:17 PM
Msg. 45182 of 54959

PS, I apologize for the double post and numerous typos My internet connection has been screwing up, hanging up, and otherwise making posting and better editing unreasonably difficult.

Good luck. And, believe me, I PRAY the worst case scenarios of what *could* when humans conduct wild-ass, poorly justified, corruptly-motivated, experiments on humans, and the planet, don't come to pass. I've got way to many friends and family who have been jabbed and jabbed again.

On the other hand, I've been travelling all over the planet, even during the thick of the delta and omicron variants, hanging out in crowds, and even helping people who had active Covid, without even a single jab. I was sort of hoping to get Covid under controlled conditions. I'm kind of irritated I never did get a positive test....although I like to think I got Covid multiple times and killed it.

P.S. Ivermectin may or may not work. But the evidence that it does work is at least as strong as the evidence the vaccines work -- as we both know, they had to change the definition of "work" and "vaccine" multiple times over the last couple of years.

Meantime, the safety record of ivermectin (whether or not it "works" in this case) is easily ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE (look up the definition if you aren't really sure of that phrase, it has huge statistical meaning) better than the mRNA "vaccines".

Again, my best wishes to you. Thank you for letting me post my opinion on your board. If you *really* feel at risk due to SARS-CoV2, look for a revised (none spike) vaccine, which does not use mRNA tech in the fall. NovaVAX should have one, and it should be immensely safer. NovaVAX is *very* high tech -- and probably a million, million times safer in terms of knowing what it does...and what it doesn't do.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next