It is possible, but certainly sounds wrong.
For instance, not all decisions are right versus wrong - some are the balance of benefits and costs, where the costs seem less than the benefits at the time.
It may be a misjudgement without being misconduct. Or even a costly decision that was better than the alternative.
Of course, he may have protected the catholic church at the expense of the children in its care, in which case, to hell with him.
We'd need to know what happened in candid fashion in order to consider doing what he wishes us to.