« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Conviction of cop for manslaughter after mistakenly using gun not taser

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 24 Dec 21 1:39 PM | 9 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 44255 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 44253 by clo2)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

You know more than me, but I saw the video and it was definitely an accident.

So whatever else she is thinking, she didn't intend to kill the guy.

I don't know why US police use weapons of several types to subdue people. Unless a person is armed or clearly aiming to harm someone, I'd say they shouldn't use them at all. Driving a car is not being armed unless they are using it in a way that is likely to injure someone.

Basically, the police get to use these weapons because other people have guns. So many people die because of that useless "right". Why is a "right" not to be harmed or at risk of being harmed by others of insufficient importance to affect the Bill of Rights? Untramelled rights are so dumb.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Conviction of cop for manslaughter after mistakenly using gun not taser
By: clo2
in ALEA
Fri, 24 Dec 21 12:44 PM
Msg. 44253 of 54959

I watched most of the trial.

I was shocked at the verdict. I thought they might find her guilty of second degree manslaughter, which they did on 12/21 at 10:30 am.
They found her guilty of first degree yesterday afternoon.

She took the stand, and she didn't help herself.

She was a 26 yr veteran. She was 'training' a rookie, and said if she was by herself she wouldn't have even stopped him, for having an 'air freshener' hanging from his mirror & expired tags (many were expired due to Covid) and they were told to let them slide.

She lied & was combative. Her tears were for herself, she did nothing to help anyone at the scene, including the other cops.

Have you seen her mug shot after she was found guilty? She has this happy face, it is weird, insulting.
[url=https://ibb.co/sQ2XM3m]Uploaded Image[/url]
Her lawyers did NOT help her, especially Mr Gray. He blamed the victim. He's old school & was insulting & offense at times.

I didn't think prosecutor Frank did a great job, but he did enough with his female prosecutor partner. She did the cross of Kim Potter.

The jury took 28 hours & 4 days, they were thoughtful.
The 12 who deliberated included six White men, three White women, two Asian women and one Black woman.

She will probably serve 7+ years.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next