« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Supreme Court won't extend reduced charges to low-level crack cocaine offenders

By: micro in BAF | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 18 Jun 21 2:47 PM | 24 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 05648 of 06530
(This msg. is a reply to 05633 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Unfortunately unless one has been hit by a car being driven by a crackhead under the influence one will not have any appreciation for the danger these druggies represent to every person on the roads, just like alcohol. Substances that ALTER the brain and diminish reaction times and thought processes should not be allowed to be used and abused imo and then these folks turn 3500 pound pieces of steel and plastic and rubber into potential maiming machines and killing machines.

There are consequences to allowing people to engage in what could become dangerous activity and when left to their own devices, well, we have a very dangerous road system to be driving one as if it was not dangerous enough already..

just a little added food to that conversation..
Now I will go back to my own little world..




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Supreme Court won't extend reduced charges to low-level crack cocaine offenders
By: Decomposed
in BAF
Mon, 14 Jun 21 5:09 PM
Msg. 05633 of 06530

Re: “The case was brought by a Florida man, Tarahrick Terry, who was sentenced to 15-and-a-half years in prison for possessing 3.9 grams of crack cocaine — about the same weight as four paper clips.”
- clo2 #msg-1180635  

So you've got a bleedin' heart for those crackheads, eh clo? Or is it just addicts in general?

Pssst. A little secret: I've got one too! But unlike you, it's not because I'm an addict or that my son is either. I just think that in a free country, what people do that doesn't hurt anybody else SHOULD be legal.


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next