Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Supreme Court won't extend reduced charges to low-level crack cocaine offenders 

By: Decomposed in BAF | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 15 Jun 21 4:57 PM | 50 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter 		Msg. 05641 of 06530
(This msg. is a reply to 05640 by ribit)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

ribit:

Re: “Just saying it isn't wise. For every person who can "handle it" there are thousands who cannot.”Agreed - it's usually not wise. When I'm riddled with cancer and given but a few months to live, I may try something. Until then, no thanks.

But that's getting away from the legality issue. Are we to be a free country, or are we not? Is it a good precedent to have laws forbidding things on the assumption that we citizens cannot "handle" them? Once the precedent for banning drugs on that basis is founded, alcohol, guns, automobile ownership, pornography, homosexuality, prostitution, premarital sex, extramarital affairs, polygamy, going outside without a mask, hunting, participating in unconventional religions and clubs, learning bombmaking and countless other freedoms we have (or, in some cases, do not have) are on the chopping block. WHO IS THE GOVERNMENT TO TELL US WHAT TO DO???? JUST A BUNCH OF ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO "TSK TSK" AT BEHAVIOR THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM THEIR OWN.

If we aren't hurting anyone, we should be free to act as we please.

BTW, some things like prostitution should be legal... but it is reasonable to have prostitution-free zones in order to safeguard neighborhoods, schools, churches, etc. As with driving, hunting, drinking, etc., rules for where people may and may not do these things may need to be established. But not banning. That's not a rule. That's the removal of a right.







Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months


 - - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Supreme Court won't extend reduced charges to low-level crack cocaine offenders
By: ribit in BAF
Tue, 15 Jun 21 4:11 PM 		Msg. 05640 of 06530

Drug addiction never made the Beatles commit crimes. Nor the seemingly 50% of other great rock-n-rollers with the same problem. Nor Demi Lovato, Ben Affleck, Bradley Cooper, Drew Barrymore, Jamie Lee Curtis, Keith Urban, Daniel Radcliffe, John Belushi or Carrie Fisher. And these are just the addicts whose drug problems made the news. Others, like Timothy Leary, did drugs and kept it under control. 

...his daughter hung herself in jail. Sounds like he was not using his drugs in a vacuum either.

...btw, I am not condemning his right to use em. Just saying it isn't wise. For every person who can "handle it" there are thousands who cannot.

« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next