Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Supreme Court won't extend reduced charges to low-level crack cocaine offenders 

By: ribit in BAF | Recommend this post (2)
Tue, 15 Jun 21 4:52 AM | 40 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter 		Msg. 05638 of 06530
(This msg. is a reply to 05637 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

...drug and or alcohol addiction is not an illness or a medical condition. It is a voluntary action with predictable results.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Supreme Court won't extend reduced charges to low-level crack cocaine offenders
By: Decomposed in BAF
Tue, 15 Jun 21 2:50 AM 		Msg. 05637 of 06530

ribit:

Re: “If they aren't committing a crime to finance their problem they are passing out and requiring first responders to pick em up take em to the hosp and get em all patched up so they can do it all over again.”When they hurt someone or someone's property, they're criminals. Not before. They don't all do that.

As for their behavior causing medical costs to rise, that's IRRELEVANT. If that matters, then we'll also need to make premarital sex and homosexuality illegal - because those are two of the main culprits in the spread of venereal disease, AIDS, hepatitis and so many other medical conditions. And what about riding motorcycles? Skiing? Visiting bars? Are you really going to ban things based on their impact on medical costs?

I think you need to give that a rethink.

« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next