Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The Supreme Court's conservatives may have the votes to expand Second Amendment rights

By: zzstar in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 27 Apr 21 8:27 PM | 22 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3 		Msg. 64480 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 64451 by zzstar)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Musta hit a nerve for the assholes, but this is REALITY:

“ The Second Amendment dictates: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Until the ruling in the 2008 Heller case, federal judges generally regarded the Second Amendment as covering state militia, such as National Guards, rather than shielding individual rights.”

Oh, and I have better and more guns than all of them. It’s an American game I am participating in. Couldn’t really give a shit about guns. But, I will have them so long as they have them, and train myself. LOL

I still can read english and they can’t, which is why they can only post here, as they are booted from everywhere else. The question is “why are they ignoring the first sentence of the militia.” Why is it there, numbskulls? Whom are they referring to?




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
The Supreme Court's conservatives may have the votes to expand Second Amendment rights
By: zzstar in FFFT3
Tue, 27 Apr 21 12:52 AM 		Msg. 64451 of 65535

“ The Second Amendment dictates: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Until the ruling in the 2008 Heller case, federal judges generally regarded the Second Amendment as covering state militia, such as National Guards, rather than shielding individual rights.”

http://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/26/politics/second-amendment-supreme-court-conservatives/index.html

From the moment I read for the first time the amendment, I knew there is NO individual right to bear arms. It is in plain ENGLISH. I do have them, THOUGH, while it lasts, and believe they should be regulated, but not like the left wants, and not a free for all as the right does.

Can we all get along?

I hope SCOTUS will tell NY to go f itself. So long as Heller is law, probing need to have a gun is cockamamie brainless “bullchit.”

« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next