« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Yet another falsehood 

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 09 Mar 21 5:39 AM | 36 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 41206 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 41202 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Yet another one.

This one from Meghan who claims her half-sister Samantha changed her name to Markle only after Harry started dating Meghan. [This to make her seem like a carpet-bagger, a horrid slur]

Entirely untrue, her half-sister says. She was always called Markle. And she has brought the receipts in the form of graduation documents and court records, which show her using the name Markle going back decades.

Plus, although Meghan says she doesn't know Samantha [to make Samantha seem to be a malicious speaker of untruths], the latter is sharing photos which prove otherwise.

Again, these seem like small lies. But they reveal the method Meghan uses [and how vicious they are to the victim]. And they show that she applies it even to granular matters.

It's becoming increasingly obvious that Meghan takes innocuous events, exaggerates and reframes them with her as victim, then uses the reminted event to garner the sympathy and attention she craves. In doing so, she damages the people around her who have done pretty much nothing wrong [but towards whom she has acted with either negligence or malice and whom she leaves behind in her wake seriously damaged].

Harry bought the false narrative and now aides and abets her in promoting the victim fantasies created by Meghan's needy personality. Even comes up with his own. A sort of Stockholm Syndrome.

So Meghan exploded the Markle family. And Harry and Meghan are exploding the monarchy. The victims aren't the two snowflakes in the story. They are the untrustworthy villains of the piece.

Don't trust the two of them. Verify their stories before assuming they are true.

The "suicidal Meghan" event fits the pattern. It's an exaggeration designed to garner sympathy. Poor, poor Meghan. But she hasn't produced any person that told her she shouldn't get help. And unless she does, I don't believe her. I think it's another example of her villain-creating method with her the victim all over again. Same with the racism claims.

Oprah is Meghan's megaphone. She's been duped and somewhat discredited as being gullible. She swallowed the stories whole when she should have challenged them.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Yet another falsehood
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Mon, 08 Mar 21 10:40 PM
Msg. 41202 of 54959

This one from Harry, when he suggested Charles stopped paying for him and Meghan's security and so he was forced to do the deals with Netflix and Spotify.

At the time, he and Meghan said one reason they wanted to exit the Royal family was because they wanted to earn their own income and to become financially independent.

They weren't forced. They chose to do that deal.

Small detail. But again, the Duke claims to be a victim by making his own dad seem cruel, when in fact this was his own choice.

Neither of the couple is fully honest. Things happen, but they put a spin on it that makes others look bad.

Charles had been generous in supporting Meghan and Harry for a few years. Instead of being grateful, Harry felt entitled, then villified his dad because he didn't wish to spend his own capital.

Compassionate behaviour? Not at all.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next