« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Another clarification 

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 08 Mar 21 3:52 PM | 27 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 41186 of 54959
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Saying that Archie might not become a prince...

It's part of the queen's policy that the royal family needs to be slimmed down. It has been her policy since long before Harry met Meghan. Prince Charles is also keen to limit the size of the royal family.

The queen has four children. All are princes and princesses. But some of her own grandchildren have no titles. I'm thinking about Peter Phillips and Zara Tindall. They have ordinary jobs. They don't get any money from the crown. They live as commoners. They are a long way down the pecking order.

Meghan insinuates that the reason Archie may be denied the title of prince is because of race. That is total balls. He's simply not in the direct line of succession and in a slimmed down monarchy, there's not much of a reason to distribute titles to people on side branches.

But still she insinuates that the reason may be racist. She did it to suggest she is a victim and Archie is a victim, of malice, But the malice is in the insinuation, and the insinuation is hers.

Call it paranoia, or a lie. But it isn't the truth. And Oprah fell for it.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next