Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: A Food and Drug Administration panel of medical experts voted, 17-4, with one abstention, to recommend Pfizer's vaccine for emergency use

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 11 Dec 20 1:41 PM | 28 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 40166 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 40162 by clo)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

If that was their objection, they should have been a qualified yes.

The good news is that COVID is probably no more deadly for the under 18s than flu. Perhaps less so as it is not even clear that it is catching for most youngsters.

It may be deadly for people with existing conditions who are under 18, but then flu may be also. And for them, herd immunity via mass vaccination may be the best policy. If they are not exposed by a third party, they won't catch it.

It's a damn shame that no one trusts anything coming out of America until Trump's people have been removed from participation up and down the chain.

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: A Food and Drug Administration panel of medical experts voted, 17-4, with one abstention, to recommend Pfizer's vaccine for emergency use
By: clo in ALEA
Fri, 11 Dec 20 1:16 PM 		Msg. 40162 of 54959

From what was reported their concern is about 16 yr old, they haven't been part of the testing.
They wanted 18 yr old & above, until more testing is done.

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next