Zim,
I think you missed my point. Do you think it was a coincidence that those three were on Trumps SC nominee list and all three became SC Justices????
We are all well aware they are NOT going to directly be on any of Trump's legal teams yet all three were on Bush 43's team. Infer what you might from that.
And fwiw - "watermarks" that these stories reference are not "printed on paper" - they are built into the paper when the paper is made. California indeed used watermarks on their ballots. IF the DHS actually provided paper to each state then there 'could' be a watermark embedded in the paper. This little tidbit - IF true - would be great. "So, while every state printed their own ballots, the paper each state used was supplied by the DHS and contains the QFS Blockchain Encryption Code."
http://principia-scientific.com/us-election-sting-will-qfs-blockchain-encryption-code-technology-win-it/
What IS interesting is the revelation that CISA HAS an auditing tool for voting that reportedly has election officials in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, Ohio and Georgia signed on to as of November 2019 and it was just updated yesterday!!
"CISA funded an independent third-party to develop an open-source election auditing tool for voluntary use by state and local election officials. (Note: The previous sentence was updated 9 November 2020.)" http://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor19
I do not put much faith in annything "open source" and surely nothing that "Votingworks" is involved in yet it might be used for recounts that should occur.
"DHS’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is partnering with non-profit group VotingWorks on an open-source software tool known as Arlo, which is provided to state and local election officials for free."
http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/471577-dhs-cyber-agency-invests-in-election-auditing-tool-to-secure-2020
The "media" is simply part of the Democratic election machine.
| 
