Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: I posted the first of two theories about this election - this is the second one. 

By: hydro_gen in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (2)
Mon, 09 Nov 20 4:54 PM | 31 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 08604 of 60014
(This msg. is a reply to 08602 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

From the CISA website:
http://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor19

This looks like it sinks the theory that the CISA provided watermarked mail in ballots to the states.

"While DHS and CISA assist states and localities with securing election infrastructure, DHS and CISA do not design, print, or audit ballots. State and local election officials manage ballot design and printing, as well as the auditing of results."

Sad




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: I posted the first of two theories about this election - this is the second one.
By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE
Mon, 09 Nov 20 4:35 PM 		Msg. 08602 of 60014

Found here: http://aceproject.org/ace-en/topics/vo/voc/voc02/voc02b


Ballot papers with special features may be restricted in potential production facilities, or not be able to be produced locally, either through lack of technology required or lack of capacity to complete the task within the available time frame. For example:

• using watermarked or other special papers;

• security print methods;

• producing in a booklet with numbered stubs;

• using full colour print and/or colour photographs of candidates.

Production of ballot papers using these more expensive methods can add significantly to election costs.

I think this means that states CAN create secure ballots but usually don't.


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next