« WRGO Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: China Leapfrogs US With World's First 6G Satellite Amid Raging Tech War

By: capt_nemo in WRGO | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 08 Nov 20 6:24 AM | 19 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Reality news,,,,,,,,
Msg. 09867 of 18626
(This msg. is a reply to 09861 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

First thing I thought as well zimmer............ Thumbs Up




Avatar

Realist - Everybody in America is soft, and hates conflict. The cure for this, both in politics and social life, is the same -- hardihood. Give them raw truth.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: China Leapfrogs US With World's First 6G Satellite Amid Raging Tech War
By: Zimbler0
in WRGO
Sun, 08 Nov 20 5:14 AM
Msg. 09861 of 18626

Hmmmm. . . .

If 5G causes cancer . . .
I suspect 6G might be even worse.

>>>
http://www.inverse.com/article/53624-do-cell-phones-cause-cancer-maybe-maybe-not

People who promote the link between cell phones and cancer often cite a large-scale study conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP), a division of the US Department of Health and Human Services.Inverse reported on the initial results of this study when they were released in 2016, but the final version came out at the end of 2018. In the study, researchers exposed more than 7,000 rats and mice to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) — that’s the type emitted by cell phones — over the course of multiple years, then analyzed the effects on the animals.

Importantly, their results are based on four categories of evidence that something may cause cancer: clear evidence (highest), some evidence, equivocal evidence, no evidence (lowest).

The researchers found “clear evidence” of malignant (cancerous) tumors in the hearts of male rats, as well as “some evidence” of malignant tumors in the brains of male rats and “some evidence” of a mix of benign and malignant tumors in the adrenal glands of male rats. “For female rats, and male and female mice, it was unclear if tumors observed in the studies were associated with RFR used by cell phones,” write the study’s authors. “This is also known as equivocal evidence.”

The studies from this project, which involved exposing many animal test subjects to RFR for two years at a time, seems pretty damning. But the caveats show that the findings aren’t directly applicable to humans.

Even though mice and rats share many biological similarities to humans in how their response to drugs and environmental hazards, they are not the same. Furthermore, they were locked in a small chamber and exposed to RFR for 9 hours a day, which isn’t representative of an average human’s experience.
>>>


And then this is China we be talking about . . .
Their track record for 'safety first' is not a good one.

(Just check the air pollution numbers for many of their cities.)

Zim.


« WRGO Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next