Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Two polls I follow and correctly predicetd 2016 

By: CTJ in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (3)
Tue, 03 Nov 20 4:04 AM | 33 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board 		Msg. 08203 of 60014
(This msg. is a reply to 08198 by Beldin)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Bush vs Gore

The US Supreme Court ruled three times in the Election fiasco:

Regarding the inability of any authority to change the rules of a Federal election after the process started (in Floriduh's case, changing the counting and reporting rules in an Electoral College election), it was 9-0.

Regarding the failure to provide equal protection of the voters and their ballots, it was 7-2.

Regarding the complete lack of a Constitutional "remedy" for the Sore Loserman campaign, it was 5-4.


http://www.atomicbobs.com/index.php?mode=read&;id=856917

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Two polls I follow and correctly predicetd 2016
By: Beldin in 6TH POPE
Tue, 03 Nov 20 1:29 AM 		Msg. 08198 of 60014

If it comes down to litigating the rules that are already in place, then it will depend on the judge in the lower court. If it is a Clinton or Soetoro nominated judge, then the decision will more than likely be made based on political expediency in favor of the Democrat Party. If it is a Bush or Trump nominated judge, then the decision will probably be made based on the rules. However, undoubtedly, they will all end up being expedited to the U.S. Supreme Court where the majority will most likely rule based on a literal reading of the rules. 

« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next