« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Forty-One Percent. 

By: Decomposed in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (3)
Mon, 02 Nov 20 11:27 PM | 25 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 08186 of 60014
(This msg. is a reply to 08184 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Beldin:

Re: “The number itself was the percentage of likely voters in Iowa supporting Joe Biden’s candidacy for president.”
Listening to Fox News today I heard an Iowan explain his recent decision to vote for Trump. Paraphrasing him:"I'm pretty liberal," he said. "But I saw the Democrats fighting to out-liberal each other and realized that they were all WAY out there. I'm not prepared for that and had to vote for Trump."

I'm hoping that there will be a lot of that sort of thinking tomorrow. The Democratic platform is alien to anything America has EVER supported. If it wins, it means that America is gone.





Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Forty-One Percent.
By: Beldin
in 6TH POPE
Mon, 02 Nov 20 11:19 PM
Msg. 08184 of 60014

http://41jellis.medium.com/forty-one-percent-a70c68a4dc22

Forty-one percent.

I’ve been covering American politics for a long time and I can’t remember a number that so dramatically altered the political community’s perception of a presidential campaign as that number did, last night, at 7:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

The source of the number was The Iowa Poll, which has been the gold standard for statewide polling in the United States for decades. The number itself was the percentage of likely voters in Iowa supporting Joe Biden’s candidacy for president.

President Trump’s number was 48%, which put him ahead in the “horse race” by 7 percentage points. There was nothing really remarkable about that, in context. Mr. Trump won the state in 2016 by (roughly) nine percentage points.

What was remarkable was Biden’s 41%. What made it doubly disconcerting was the way The Des Moines Register (accurately) described the poll results:

“Republican President Donald Trump has taken over the lead in Iowa as Democratic former Vice President Joe Biden has faded…”

Faded! Could there be a more terrible word in the last week of a presidential campaign? Off the record, Democratic elected officials and campaign operatives and financial backers have been saying throughout the campaign that their biggest fear regarding the eventual outcome was Biden himself. They saw him as an especially weak candidate and worried that he wasn’t “a closer;” even if he was ahead going into the last week, victory could slip from his grasp.

Up until last night, Democratic elected officials and political operatives saw the presidential race standing at somewhere between a narrow Biden win and a “blue wave.” In their “blue wave” scenario, the Democrats would win both the presidency and a Senate majority and the Trump-McConnell nightmare would finally come to an end.

That was the other piece of bad news in last night’s Iowa Poll release. It showed that Republican Sen. Joni Ernst had pulled ahead of her Democratic challenger, Theresa Greenfield. Her lead (46%-to-42%) was within the margin of error, but it wasn’t Ms. Ernst’s lead that Democrats were focused on. It was the “faded” support for Ms. Greenfield, which almost exactly tracked the “faded” support for Joe Biden.

For Democrats, last night’s Iowa Poll was the worst possible news at the worst possible moment. It foretold close results in Wisconsin and Minnesota. It undermined the Biden campaign’s momentum and morale. And it fracked Democrats’ self- confidence.

What had seemed reasonably certain no longer seemed certain at all.


« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next