« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The Supreme Court refused Pennsylvania Republicans’ plea to expedite a ruling on their request to halt an extension of the absentee-ballot deadline.

By: clo in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 29 Oct 20 11:26 AM | 21 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 61169 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 61165 by oldCADuser)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

They are going to keep the ones that come in after 11/3 separate, so if the court changes their decision....




Avatar

DO SOMETHING!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: The Supreme Court refused Pennsylvania Republicans’ plea to expedite a ruling on their request to halt an extension of the absentee-ballot deadline.
By: oldCADuser
in FFFT3
Thu, 29 Oct 20 1:51 AM
Msg. 61165 of 65535

So what do they think they're going to do, retroactively tell states that they have to go back and un-count votes? That would be worse than what they did in 'Bush v Gore'. There they only stopped the counting of votes, but at least the one's which had already been counted, stayed counted.


« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next