« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Wisconsin’s Conservative Justices Temporarily Block Mailing of Ballots for Knife-Edge Presidential Contest 

By: micro in BAF | Recommend this post (3)
Wed, 16 Sep 20 4:19 PM | 91 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 05283 of 06530
(This msg. is a reply to 05276 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

De
The truth is that Dementia Joe does not have a commanding lead, or any lead at all.

Unless the Dems successdfully off the ballot harvesting and change lotsof ballots, and cast plenty more for people found in the cemetaries with markers, they are going to get a royal beat down of historic proportions.

They have overplayed their hand as usual and gone all in on failing Dementia Joe.

I think its time we started to reign in the criminal activity of Antifa and BLM so called protestors, AKA Rioters and looters and criminals...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Wisconsin’s Conservative Justices Temporarily Block Mailing of Ballots for Knife-Edge Presidential Contest
By: Decomposed
in BAF
Sun, 13 Sep 20 9:54 PM
Msg. 05276 of 06530

Re: “For President Donald Trump to have any chance of staying in power, he needs to repeat his 2016 shock victory in Wisconsin.”
- clo http://www.atomicbobs.com/index.php?mode=read&id=1148147 ;

Is that so??

I'll just remind you that the President defeated Hillary Clinton four years ago by 77 electoral votes. Wisconsin has TEN votes. I'd tell you to do the math, but with your grade school education, you might get it wrong. So, clo, if the President repeats his 2016 results except for Wisconsin, he'd still win by 57 votes. Your author is wrong.

I continue to sense panic in your posts - sometimes in your writing; sometimes in what your authors have said. I wonder why that is if Joe has the commanding lead your sources claim. Could it be because his lead isn't nearly as commanding as Hillary Clinton's was in 2016, even though your pollsters are even more partisan than they were back then? Or because you lack confidence that the public will vote for a senile old man once he finally leaves his hidey-hole and shows himself to be mentally feeble in debate #1? (Relax. My sources say he's going to be a no-show.) Or could it be because of hints coming out of the very stories you've been posting, like the one about Bloomberg intending to spend 100 million dollars in Florida, entirely on Biden??? Does it make any sense that Bloomberg would do that if he thought Biden was going to win without it???

LOL.


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next