http://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/09/09/dulis-critical-race-theorys-endgame-is-a-thought-police-amendment-to-the-constitution/
President Donald Trump’s ban on “Critical Race Theory” in federal employees’ training has exposed one of the major fault lines in America’s culture war, a nakedly authoritarian worldview that is turning coworkers, congregants, and even family members against one another. ...
The central thesis of How to Be an Antiracist (HTBAA) is that antiracists “dismantle” racist “systems.” But this raises the question of just how far that principle — tearing down any concept, law, or establishment which correlates with unequal aggregate outcomes — should actually go. According to my colleague Joel Pollak, CRT holds that all of America “is racist by design, because its Constitution and all of its other institutions emerged in a context where slavery was legal.” And Christian apologist Neil Shenvi points out that one can easily argue — and some academics already have — that institutions as fundamental as marriage perpetuate racial inequality. Thus, a federal law abolishing marriage would be antiracist by Kendi’s definition.
Come on, though. Would he really go that far? If you made this rockstar academic king for a day, would it really be all that bad?
In September 2019, months after releasing HTBAA, Kendi gave us our answer — a single paragraph in Politico, a proposal just specific enough to expose the totalitarian heartbeat of a CRT Idea Man:
To fix the original sin of racism, Americans should pass an anti-racist amendment to the U.S. Constitution that enshrines two guiding anti-racist principals: Racial inequity is evidence of racist policy and the different racial groups are equals. The amendment would make unconstitutional racial inequity over a certain threshold, as well as racist ideas by public officials (with “racist ideas” and “public official” clearly defined). It would establish and permanently fund the Department of Anti-racism (DOA) comprised of formally trained experts on racism and no political appointees. The DOA would be responsible for preclearing all local, state and federal public policies to ensure they won’t yield racial inequity, monitor those policies, investigate private racist policies when racial inequity surfaces, and monitor public officials for expressions of racist ideas. The DOA would be empowered with disciplinary tools to wield over and against policymakers and public officials who do not voluntarily change their racist policy and ideas. [emphasis added]
Get that? Racism will be “fixed” when unelected bureaucrats become an official fourth branch of the government. You don’t need to know much about civics or our Constitution to see the problems here:
1. They’ll have perpetual veto power over every governing body in the U.S., including all 89,000 local governments.
2. Just in case you missed the word “monitor,” they will be able to block legislation both before it passes and perpetually evaluate it afterward — presumably to shut it down unilaterally if the results are deemed unacceptable.
3. They can eliminate “private racist policies” — that’s not defined here, but if every public body is already covered, doesn’t this give them authority over private businesses’ self-governance?
4. They can discipline people for “expressions of racist ideas.” ...
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
| 
