Here's a case where the restriction of the US government's claims to censorship actually applies.
I am sure the Bananarepublicans will be extremely concerned, as they wet their beds over what they perceive as their right to bring their conspiracy theories everywhere.
Here's an actual abridgement using the transparently false claim of national security to control a person's desire to publish a book, which the administration perceives is to the detriment of the president.
Bananarepublicans ought to be up in arms. John Bolton has "a right" to free speech.
Others of them might suddenly realise that just because one law says something does not mean it holds in all circumstances. Laws can contradict one another and they can contradict the constitution and the rights it enumerates.
No. That's too much to expect. They are bananas for a reason. They'll argue it's a state secret to provide examples of Trump dribbling on his sharpies, or making decisions for electoral purposes.
| 