« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

"Maybe YOU can answer this, no one else has": Brit Hume calls out "Team Apocalypse" in heated back and forth on lockdowns 

By: Beldin in 6TH POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 28 May 20 8:08 PM | 21 view(s)
Boardmark this board | 6th Edition Pope Board
Msg. 00826 of 60014
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

http://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2020/05/28/maybe-you-can-answer-this-no-one-else-has-brit-hume-calls-out-team-apocalypse-in-heated-back-and-forth-on-lockdowns/

It all started with a very basic tweet from Alex Berenson about the joke lockdowns have been all along.

Alex Berenson ~ Starting to look like if we'd reopened faster we'd have even fewer deaths.

Alex Berenson ~ CORRECTION: As someone just pointed out, the estimate was actually from @hhsgov and @fema (@nytimes highlighted the @cdcgov, but in reality CDC merely provided data). My error.

CDC report actually shows the virus was never as dangerous or deadly as we were led to believe but you know, WEAR A MASK if you don't want grandma to die or whatever.

Enter Team Apocalypse:

Mickey Kaus ~ Alternatively: We're not going to come close to the predicted 3000 daily deaths (good news! You were right!) because of lockdown/mitigation policies you opposed.

So Mickey seems to think the lockdowns are why the virus wasn't as deadly ... interesting.

Brit Hume asked him a very poignant question:

Brit Hume ~ Mickey, maybe you can answer this. No one else has: where are the studies or even data points that show that stay-at-home policies are more effective than more moderate measures including physical distancing, frequent hand-washing and crowd avoidance, esp. indoors?

Mickey Kaus ~ I haven't looked for studies. Seems a hard finding to tease out since hardest hit states will lockdown, whether or not it works. But a) I live in CA where most attribute at least some of our low death rate (100 per 100K, vs. NY's 1,518 ) to our early lockdown. 1/2

b) Do you really think NY wouldn't have many more deaths if businesses & stores had stayed open-with people shopping normally etc as celebrated by Berenson in upstate towns-and going to work? Also c) we were deciding when we didn't know much. So err on safe side. Now we know more.

Brit Hume ~ Nothing "safe" about lockdowns. The collateral damage has been enormous. Also, none of the studies cited by NRO, as far as I can tell, distinguishes between moderate precautions and lockdowns.

"Nothing safe about lockdowns."

He's right you know.

Lockdowns didn't actually do much to help, even the data shows as much.

Sorry, not sorry.

Mike ~ Not to mention that an enormous number of deaths were in nursing homes and LTC facilities that were required to take COVID patients.

The very nursing homes Democratic governors put very sick COVID patients.

Yup.

jon gabriel ~ The only people confident in their solutions are non-experts. Epidemiologists say they still don't know enough about the virus to say.

Plenty of non-experts think they know.

Welcome to Twitter.




Avatar

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence




» You can also:
« 6TH POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next