« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Obama team fully vetted Biden in 2008 and found no hint of former aide's allegation

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 03 May 20 1:37 PM | 39 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 36006 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 36005 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Yep.

And the person alleging he did something bad said she forgot to mention it in a letter of complaint written more than two decades ago of which there is no record.

Questions worth asking. Is this woman mentallly ill? Has she a record of making false claims? These are the sorts of things curious people wish to know as her story unravels. She cancelled her booking on Fox News and one of her witnesses diluted her story.

Whereas the allegations against the sexual predator president are numerous and persuasive of a repulsive character. The orange fatty is the Harvey Weinstein president.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Obama team fully vetted Biden in 2008 and found no hint of former aide's allegation
By: clo
in ALEA
Sun, 03 May 20 1:32 PM
Msg. 36005 of 54959

Obama team fully vetted Biden in 2008 and found no hint of former aide's allegation

Opinion by David Axelrod, CNN Senior Political Commentator
Updated 11:56 PM ET, Fri May 1, 2020

When it became clear that Barack Obama would be the nominee of the Democratic Party in the spring of 2008, he commissioned a team of lawyers to begin an in-depth vetting process of potential candidates for vice president.

Dozens of women and men under consideration were reviewed. Those who rose on the list of contenders were subject to a deep-dive investigation of their strengths, vulnerabilities and, of course, any disqualifying defects.
At the top of the list of those contenders was Senator Joseph R. Biden of Delaware.

The comprehensive vet certainly would have turned up any formal complaints filed against Biden during his 36-year career in the Senate. It did not. The team would have investigated any salacious rumors of the sort that travel far and wide in Washington. There were none.

While I was not on the vetting team, as senior strategist to the campaign, I was briefed on their work and potential problems.

Through that entire process, the name Tara Reade never came up. No formal complaint. No informal chatter. Certainly, no intimation of sexual harassment or assault from her or anyone else. The team of investigators, expert in their work, would not have missed it.

Reade did not surface her allegations of a criminal sexual assault when Biden was a candidate for president in 2008, nor did she offer them confidentially to the Obama vetting team when Biden emerged as a principal contender for vice president later that year.

Had any credible issue been raised, you can be sure Biden would not have been the nominee. Obama would not have tolerated it, even if he and Biden were close then, which they were not. Their friendship grew only after Biden joined the ticket and through their eight-year partnership in the White House. At that time, they were distant Senate colleagues and most recently rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Our society is just now confronting a long, sordid history of disregarding accusations and silencing women who were sexually abused or assaulted. Women who come forward deserve to be taken seriously and treated with respect, and Tara Reade's story should be heard and thoroughly investigated.

But it is striking that when an experienced vetting team put Biden under a microscope before he was chosen to be second-in-line for the presidency, neither her allegations, nor anything resembling them in Biden's history, showed up.

http://www.cnn.com/2020/05/01/opinions/biden-tara-reade-allegations-2008-vetting-axelrod/index.html


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next