Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Tara Reade

By: xcslewis in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 18 Apr 20 11:37 PM | 44 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 35724 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 35723 by Cactus Flower)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I agree with your conclusion but replace Biden with Kavanaugh.

“There are marginal situations. This isn't one of them. We all know who Kavanaugh is. We all know why this person has appeared on the scene. It's dirty politics.”

I disagree that a pattern of allegations by multiple accusers is sufficient evidence to simply accept the allegations are true and all accusers should be believed. It is always a murky situation but it seems to me different standards are used.


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Tara Reade
By: Cactus Flower in ALEA
Sat, 18 Apr 20 10:25 PM 		Msg. 35723 of 54959

It's an obvious smear, csl. We both know it.

We've been talking about these situations for months. It's the pattern that counts. When you see someone like Harvey Weinstein or Bill Cosby or Donald Trump with a pattern of behaviour, then believe the accusers. When there's an accuser with a likely motive, presume the innocence of the accused unless material evidence is brought.

There are marginal situations. This isn't one of them. We all know who Biden is. We all know why this person has appeared on the scene. It's dirty politics.

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next