« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: if someone dies with COVID-19 we are counting that

By: xcslewis in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 08 Apr 20 8:44 PM | 21 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 35378 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 35365 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

This was posted elsewhere. I have not taken the time to verify.

" According to the CDC’s website, in March 2020 there were a total of 193,000 deaths in the US. The average number of deaths in the US for March over the four years prior to 2020 (2016 – 2019) is 227,000.

It appears HCQ may be a very inexpensive, generic medication that may be effective against many viruses. It has nominal and known side effects. The pharma industry has a vested financial interest in promoting vaccines. The extensive use of HCQ threatens that financial interest. There are many medical professionals across the world advocating the use of HCQ.

It’s not rocket science, when you are in a foxhole fighting for your life you use the weapons you have, rather than waiting for something better that might come along after you are long dead. Maybe you need to be an American to understand.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: if someone dies with COVID-19 we are counting that
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Wed, 08 Apr 20 4:26 PM
Msg. 35365 of 54959

I am old enough to remember when Trump supporters decided malaria tablets were a magic pill for no reason other than that Trump said so.

I gather that disbelieving the figures to justify restarting the economy is the up-and-coming narrative of Fox News.

So no surprise that you are marching in lockstep, eh, csl!

There's no doubt that there are some people who would have died and not of coronavirus in the same time period. Healthy people also die in car crashes, although not nearly as many as are dying of coronavirus. And some people would have died of heart attacks if they didn't get coronavirus. But as a percentage, the crossover is also likely to be very small.

Just so you know, the powers that be are generally not counting people who are already dead, and whose death was likely the result of coronavirus. This undercounting is probably vast.

How do we know this? Not only because the states are telling us this is what they are doing.

But also because it is possible to compare the normal number of deaths in each week of the year with the data for other years. And it looks like the numbers dying are far greater than those who usually die at this time of year.

Coronavirus is the explanation reasonable people are sticking with.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next