« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Supreme Court Sounds Ready to Let Criminals Walk at Bridgegate Hearing

By: clo in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 15 Jan 20 1:30 PM | 26 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 33772 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 33768 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

There is history for thinking they might.

Supreme Court overturns corruption conviction of former Va. governor McDonnell

By Robert BarnesJune 27, 2016
The Supreme Court unanimously overturned former Virginia governor Robert F. McDonnell’s public-corruption conviction Monday and imposed higher standards for federal prosecutors who charge public officials with wrongdoing.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. described the former governor’s actions as “tawdry” but agreed that instructions to the jury in his case about what constitutes “official acts” were so broad, they could cover almost any action a public official takes.

McDonnell’s promising political career was derailed by his entanglement with a businessman who showered the governor and his family with luxury gifts and financial benefits. McDonnell and his wife, Maureen, were indicted and convicted after he left office in January 2014.

Legal experts said the new standards would make it difficult for federal prosecutors to retry McDonnell, but Roberts said the Supreme Court was expressing no view on that.

“If the court below determines that there is sufficient evidence for a jury to convict Governor McDonnell of committing or agreeing to commit an ‘official act,’ his case may be set for a new trial,” Roberts wrote. “If the court instead determines that the evidence is insufficient, the charges against him must be dismissed.”

The chief justice seemed concerned that the public might take the view that the court was endorsing politics as usual.

“There is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns,” Roberts wrote. “It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.”

more:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-rules-unanimously-in-favor-of-former-va-robert-f-mcdonnell-in-corruption-case/2016/06/27/38526a94-3c75-11e6-a66f-aa6c1883b6b1_story.html




Avatar

DO SOMETHING!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Supreme Court Sounds Ready to Let Criminals Walk at Bridgegate Hearing
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Wed, 15 Jan 20 10:24 AM
Msg. 33768 of 54959

I think we are going to find that it is misleading and inflammatory to suggest that a majority of the SCOTUS believes political corruption is not necessarily a crime.

I might argue that the majority of the justices on SCOTUS believe a bunch of nutty and/or religious and/or historically inaccurate things, but I wouldn't bother to argue a premise that they are soft on corruption.

For sure I would wait until they rule on a matter before presuming such a motive. The Daily Beast should know we are not Trump supporters, whose outrage is always ripe for manipulation so long as a media organisation wants to sell its ink. And I am not planning to become like them.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next