« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: When is a country really a democracy?

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 23 Sep 19 10:26 AM | 33 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 31776 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 31775 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I don't mean to suggest that qualifying as a democracy and having all of its purest attributes is necessarily a more virtuous state than not qualifying and not having all of its purest attributes.

I am more of a pragmatist. I care about what works more than I do about ideals. And by what works, I mean what maximises happiness and minimises misery.

In fact, I believe that democracies themselves benefit from restraints of sorts. But mostly, democracy in its different flavours delivers more happiness and less misery than any other system we know.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
When is a country really a democracy?
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Mon, 23 Sep 19 9:43 AM
Msg. 31775 of 54959

When it has a voting system which lets an assembly of qualifying people from that country take decisions about laws?

When it has a voting system which provides qualifying people from that country to a parliament whose obligation is to act as their representatives?

When a large body of qualifying people in a country have a right or a duty to vote?

When voting and representation qualifications include age-related factors, such as adulthood?

When qualifying voters have the ability to remove from office within a fixed period those whom they previously chose to represent them?

When there are no powers vested in aristocracies or monarchies which can restrict decisions made by the people or their representatives?

When elected leaders are subject to the rule of law?

When no part of the population is enslaved and hence every qualifying adult can vote as an equal of everyone else?

When qualifying people of both biological sexes are treated as equals from a voting perspective?

When there are no qualifications on voting other than citizenship, adulthood and sanity?

When there are no qualifications on representation other than citizenship, adulthood and sanity?

Or are there simply different flavours of democracy, each of which is a work-in-progress?


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next