Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Trump administration cancels English classes, soccer, legal aid for unaccompanied child migrants in U.S. shelters 

By: micro in BAF | Recommend this post (3)
Fri, 07 Jun 19 1:49 AM | 62 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter 		Msg. 04148 of 06530
(This msg. is a reply to 04147 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

De

"The expense would be enormous to bring teachers to all the shelters to teach those illegal invading children BUT according to brainless twit Clo, expenses don't count and neither do laws.
Problem solved.

Clo is going to volunteer to pay personally for all those teachers to be brought to ALL tose shelters to teach kids who cannot speak English and really do not want to anyway, but being the magnanimous person CLo is, NOTHING should stand in the way of wasting money so she has volunteered to waste her own ..

Three cheers for the resident dipstick..... What a gal.... Shocked Shocked Shocked Moon Neutral Barf Barf


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Trump administration cancels English classes, soccer, legal aid for unaccompanied child migrants in U.S. shelters
By: Decomposed in BAF
Thu, 06 Jun 19 10:36 PM 		Msg. 04147 of 06530

Re: "This is appalling & heartless. It’s also illegal. For instance, In 1982, SCOTUS held undocumented K-12 age kids are entitled to education & explicitly that you can’t deny funding."
- clo #msg-1088589  

As usual, clo, your brain is not engaged. The 1982 case actually said that illegal alien children could not be denied education unless doing so would further a substantial government interest. In 1982, the majority found that the Texas law did not meet that standard. Today, though, the government is reporting that there is a critical budget shortfall. Do you have some evidence that that's not true, clo? If you don't, then you don't know what you're talking about and should really... uh, how to put this delicately? ... shut your yap.

There are also other factors that make the 1982 ruling a poor precedent, chief among them being that the children in question are "in US shelters." Now you're talking about teachers being brought to the shelters, and there are a LOT of shelters. The expense would be enormous.

« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next