« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Before Trumps purge at DHS, top officials challenged plan for mass family arrests

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 14 May 19 6:27 PM | 50 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 30054 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 30051 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

If an immigration judge orders refugees deported, isn't that because he thinks they are just illegal immigrants, not refugees?

At any rate, for myself I have no problem with deporting illegal immigrants whose cases a judge has reviewed. That's just following the law, isn't it?

Maybe I am missing something.

Obviously, we have seen that Miller and Trump have racial motives. And their focus on brown people is horrifying. But I don't see that Vitiello and Nielsen did much wrong here. They were dealing with a practical issue and not an ethical and legal one. The judge decides legal and ethical questions. No?

Also, I don't know whether V and N presented practical issues as a cover for ethical concerns. But one thing is clear. Trump and Miller were setting them up to take the blame. And they decided they weren't going to do what was asked of them.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Before Trump’s purge at DHS, top officials challenged plan for mass family arrests
By: clo
in ALEA
Tue, 14 May 19 4:58 PM
Msg. 30051 of 54959

These people are evil!

Before Trump’s purge at DHS, top officials challenged plan for mass family arrests
By Nick Miroff and
Josh Dawsey May 13 at 8:11 PM

In the weeks before they were ousted last month, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and top immigration enforcement official Ronald Vitiello challenged a secret White House plan to arrest thousands of parents and children in a blitz operation against migrants in 10 major U.S. cities.

According to seven current and former Department of Homeland Security officials, the administration wanted to target the crush of families that had crossed the U.S.-Mexico border after the president’s failed “zero tolerance” prosecution push in early 2018. The ultimate purpose, the officials said, was a show of force to send the message that the United States was going to get tough by swiftly moving to detain and deport recent immigrants — including families with children.

The sprawling operation included an effort to fast-track immigration court cases, allowing the government to obtain deportation orders against those who did not show for their hearings — officials said 90 percent of those targeted were found deportable in their absence. The subsequent arrests would have required coordinated raids against parents with children in their homes and neighborhoods.

But Vitiello and Nielsen halted it, concerned about a lack of preparation by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, the risk of public outrage and worries that it would divert resources from the border.

Senior Trump adviser Stephen Miller and ICE Deputy Director Matthew Albence were especially supportive of the plan, officials said, eager to execute dramatic, highly visible mass arrests that they argued would help deter the soaring influx of families.

The arrests were planned for New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and the other largest U.S. destinations for Central American migrants. Though some of the cities are considered “sanctuary” jurisdictions with police departments that do not cooperate with ICE, the plan did not single out those locations, officials said.

ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations branch had an initial target list of 2,500 adults and children, but the plan, which remains under consideration, was viewed as a first step toward arresting as many as 10,000 migrants. The vast majority of families who have crossed the border in the past 18 months seeking asylum remain in the country, awaiting a court date or in defiance of deportation orders.

DHS officials said the objections Vitiello and Nielsen raised regarding the targeted “at large” arrests were mostly operational and logistical and not as a result of ethical concerns about arresting families an immigration judge had ordered to be deported. 

“There was concern that it was being hastily put together, would be ineffective and might actually backfire by misdirecting resources away from critical border emergency response operations,” said one DHS official, who, like others, described the plan on the condition of anonymity.

....
But administration officials who described the plan said Vitiello and Nielsen’s pushback was a factor in President Trump’s decision to oust both officials — particularly Vitiello.

more:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/before-trumps-purge-at-dhs-top-officials-challenged-plan-for-mass-family-arrests/2019/05/13/d7cb91ce-75af-11e9-bd25-c989555e7766_story.html?utm_term=.182bc7da81fc


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next