« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Why not indict the Trump Organization?

By: oldCADuser in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 20 Dec 18 5:09 PM | 55 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 47509 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 47492 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Uploaded Image




Avatar

OCU




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Why not indict the Trump Organization?
By: clo
in FFFT3
Wed, 19 Dec 18 9:27 PM
Msg. 47492 of 65535

Why not indict the Trump Organization?

By Jennifer Rubin
December 19 at 1:45 PM

Legal scholars debate whether a sitting president can be indicted or only impeached. If the latter, it’s not clear given the statutes of limitation on most crimes whether he could ever be prosecuted for certain crimes. That surely seems wrong; the framers certainly did not intend to give the president a get-out-of-jail free card for crimes he might commit in office. (One solution might be to indict under seal.)

What is clear, however, is that to the extent the president has a safe harbor for prosecution during his time in office, that protection is personal to him. His relatives and his business empire don’t get that benefit.

Indict a corporation (or a foundation or an LLC)? That’s what happened to the accounting firm Arthur Andersen in connection with the Enron scandal. The firm itself was indicted on a charge of alleged widespread obstruction of justice.

The Justice Department actually has some fairly clear rules as to when an organization can be indicted. The Justice Department’s “Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations” state:
more:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2018/12/19/why-not-indict-trump-organization/?utm_term=.7a49a22a798b


« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next