« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: another freeloader..

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 13 Oct 18 6:56 PM | 88 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 27294 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 27293 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I don't blame a chap for taking advantage of tax minimisation techniques. I blame the law for providing them. And voters for electing the party which benefits the wealthy at the expense of the poor.

Actually, I make an exception for a president. They shouldn't run if they don't pay their way.

Fortunately for Trump & co, they have supporters who will say the reason for the deficit is nothing to do with rich people structuring tax law so they don't contribute their share, but that the vulnerable cost too much.

Strange. Obama could afford them. Then Trump lowered taxes. Then there was a deficit. By gosh, ain't it possible that the problem is on the tax income side of things, not the expenditures.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
another freeloader..
By: clo
in ALEA
Sat, 13 Oct 18 6:18 PM
Msg. 27293 of 54959

Kushner Likely Paid No Federal Income Taxes for Years, Documents Show

Confidential documents reviewed by The Times indicate that Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and adviser, probably paid little or no income tax from 2009 to 2016.

By Jesse Drucker and Emily Flitter
Oct. 13, 2018

Over the past decade, Jared Kushner’s family company has spent billions of dollars buying real estate. His personal stock investments have soared. His net worth has quintupled to almost $324 million.

And yet, for several years running, Mr. Kushner — President Trump’s son-in-law and a senior White House adviser — appears to have paid almost no federal income taxes, according to confidential financial documents reviewed by The New York Times.

His low tax bills are the result of a common tax-minimizing maneuver that, year after year, generated millions of dollars in losses for Mr. Kushner, according to the documents. But the losses were only on paper — Mr. Kushner and his company did not appear to actually lose any money. The losses were driven by depreciation, a tax benefit that lets real estate investors deduct a portion of the cost of their buildings from their taxable income every year.

In 2015, for example, Mr. Kushner took home $1.7 million in salary and investment gains. But those earnings were swamped by $8.3 million of losses, largely because of “significant depreciation” that Mr. Kushner and his company took on their real estate, according to the documents reviewed by The Times.

more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/13/business/jared-kushner-taxes.html


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next