Suppose, ZZ, there was a precinct which was
overwhelmingly for Donald Trump. And that
after the election, the 'box' said there
were 300 votes for Trump . . .
And after they election 'they' decided to do a
recount, and they only found 60 ballots inside
the box.
Wouldn't that be a clear case of voting fraud?
I mean, the computer said 300 votes but inside
the box there were only 50 ballots . . . What's wrong with this picture?
Now, read this :
https://www.infowars.com/detroit-recount-observer-box-marked-306-ballots-only-had-50-inside/
Penny’s precinct, Detroit Precinct #152 had an unbroken seal and everything looked proper. The tag on the box said 306 and the book said 306 and the ticket said 306, so there should be 306 paper ballots on the box, right. Well when they pulled out the ballots the stack seemed short and when they finished separating the two page ballot to count the Presidential page only guess how many ballots were in the box? 304 no, 299 nope, 200 nada, how about 100 wrong again. There were only exactly 50 paper ballots in a locked sealed box that again was supposed to have 306.
Crider noted, “since there was a discrepancy in the two numbers the original count stands.”
According to the Wayne County Clerk’s publicly released vote totals for Precinct 152, Hillary Clinton got 250 votes and Donald Trump received 31. The candidate who demanded the recount — Jill Stein — got 11 votes. Other candidates received a combined 12 votes.
>>>
This is still voting fraud, is it not ?
Zim.
| 