« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it... 

By: Zimbler0 in BAF | Recommend this post (3)
Fri, 09 Mar 18 8:02 AM | 81 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 01383 of 06531
(This msg. is a reply to 01380 by zzstar)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>>
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

In District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (200Cool, the Supreme Court undertook its first-ever "in-depth examination" of the second amendment's meaning Id. at 635. After a lengthy historical discussion, the Court ultimately concluded that the second amendment "guarantee[s] the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation"

>>>

YOU posted the link to the article saying this.

What you wrote is a lie.
What you wrote is what you wish it said. Not what it really said.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...
By: zzstar
in BAF
Fri, 09 Mar 18 7:57 AM
Msg. 01380 of 06531

Did you read what I wrote, asshat, which is exactly what you repeated? Which you also failed to understand that it says “for self protection in the home�, AND UNLOADED, AND NOTHING ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE!

Which is why I call you ZIMDIOT!


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next