Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...

By: zzstar in BAF | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 06 Mar 18 11:52 PM | 42 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter 		Msg. 01284 of 06530
(This msg. is a reply to 01281 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

The la language of the 2nd Amendment does not give the right to bear arms to individuals, only to organized militia. It also doesn’t say WHY, nor mentions “overbearing governments” and other shit like that made of deludions of the simple minded, who believe those who feed tnem shit to make money selling guns, and the whole gun culture ecosystem feeding off that baloney.

If you want to argue otherwise, and not obfuscuate with bullshit, analyze fir me the 2nd Amendment language, and nothing else.


 - - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...
By: Decomposed in BAF
Tue, 06 Mar 18 7:56 PM 		Msg. 01281 of 06530

Re: "Perhaps we should impose the same rules for personal firearms as we do in the Army, like not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it..."
- OCU #msg-1033199  

In other words, junk the 2nd Amendment. We already suspected you had UnAmerican beliefs. This confirms it. (Unless you're suggesting it be legally repealed - which is fine with me. You'll never succeed, but you're welcome to pursue this.)

Consider that the purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to allow the citizens to rise up against an overbearing government. If government does as you propose and selects the people who "pass a class and demonstrate that [they]'re qualified to shoot," don't you see that there'd be just the tiniest bit of conflict of interest? Tyrants could legally prevent any opponent from fighting back.

Yeah. Great idea you've got there, OCU.

« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next