« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Protectionism FACTS with article and link below

By: zzstar in BAF | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 06 Mar 18 6:43 AM | 65 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 01266 of 06530
(This msg. is a reply to 01259 by micro)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

C’mon, this cookie’s already stale.

China does not figure in the top ten steele importers to the US at this time.

You are spending your time where it doesn’t matter, and you are not learning anything from it, just out of date bullshit opinion from some hedge fund guy out there. Nothing.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Protectionism FACTS with article and link below
By: micro
in BAF
Mon, 05 Mar 18 7:42 PM
Msg. 01259 of 06530

This portion is taken from the entire article provided by Nemo. It is excellent re-cap and worth reading..

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-04/these-countries-are-responsible-americas-trade-deficit


As we noted previously, while many have been quick to slam Trump's strategy, at least one hedge fund believes that Trump is correct in his trade war stance. Here is Stephen Jen from SLJ Macro Partners:

The US is the least protectionist large economy in the world, while China is the most protectionist. In our note on this subject a couple of weeks ago, we pointed out that the US, based on data from the WTO, is by far the least protectionist nation in the world (with the exception of a tariff-free city state like Hong Kong) — far more open than Europe, Japan, and especially China. And it seems a bit hypocritical to us that more protectionist nations are complaining about the actions of the least protectionist nation.

Excess capacity in China. China has half of the world's steel production capacity, much of which is excessive and unnecessary, even Beijing would admit. The 2008-09 RMB4 trillion stimulus in China further boosted China's industrial capacity, including in steel and other sunset industries. This has led to a situation where Chinese steel production had to be exported to the rest of the world at very low prices. Some in the US, not surprisingly, consider this 'dumping'. Further, both the US and the EU share the verdict that China is still not a 'market-based' economy, because of the large and persistent explicit and implicit government subsidies, and other forms of support from the public sector, that make Chinese products unfairly competitive.

Why is Europe not held to the same standard as the US? Europe is complaining about the US' latest policy. Investors should know that Europe has already imposed two dozen anti-dumping measures against Chinese steel exports. What then is the substantive difference between the anti-dumping measures imposed by the EU and what the Trump Administration is doing? Is Europe less protectionist than the US? If Europe were so open, what is all the fuss about Brexit and the inability of the UK to access the European market? 

As Jonathan Ferro (@FerroTV) so eloquently tweeted, "hate to puncture some of the narratives out there. But... EU tariffs on US autos = 10% US tariffs on EU autos = 2.5%"

Thank you Nemo ! Very Happy Thumbs Up


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next