« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Assault Weapons Not Protected by Second Amendment

By: zzstar in FFFT3 | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 26 Feb 18 10:15 PM | 68 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 3
Msg. 41493 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 41491 by weco)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

The 2nd Amendment does not give individuals the right to have guns, of any type, to begin with.

Knowing America’s histoical culture and way of life, we allow for handguns and hunting rifles. All else is excluded.

The Congress banned machineguns in 1934 because they considered them dangerous. An AR 15 is a dangerous man killing machine of war, and virtually a machinegun with a bump stock and 30 clip. Even the ones the US uses have a 3 bullet auto fire limit before you gotta hit the trigger again.

Fuggetaboutit.

Like I said, tne 2nd Amendment bullshit has to be attacked first, before we get to anything else. That right which does not exist must be made clear is only allowed for the sake of Historical culture, and that is for handguns and hunting rifles. You want to honor your history, dude? Then go hunting with a gun powder loading Winchester. THAT’s your History.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Assault Weapons Not Protected by Second Amendment
By: weco
in FFFT3
Mon, 26 Feb 18 10:05 PM
Msg. 41491 of 65535

Assault Weapons Not Protected by Second Amendment, Federal Appeals Court Rules
by THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Maryland's ban on 45 kinds of assault weapons and its 10-round limit on gun magazines were upheld Tuesday by a federal appeals court in a decision that met with a strongly worded dissent.

In a 10-4 ruling, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, said the guns banned under Maryland's law aren't protected by the Second Amendment.

"Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war," Judge Robert King wrote for the court, adding that the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller explicitly excluded such coverage.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/assault-weapons-not-protected-second-amendment-federal-appeals-court-rules-n724106


« FFFT3 Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next